Abstract
A test designed to evaluate nondestructive flaw detection proficiency by ultrasonic and eddy current methods has been conducted. Test data for each participant are reduced to contingency table format, and analysis of these tables via traditional measures of association is used to rank individual performances. The presence of false calls in an inspection record introduces a random inflation in flaw detection results. Measures are required which compensate for that fact. Proficiency rankings based on two such measures, Somers'd coefficient and the mean square contingency coefficient, show reasonable consistency with intuition-based rankings by experienced observers. Finally, a weighted generalization of Somers'sd is suggested, although optimal selection of weights remains an open problem.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
