Treatment of EGJ Cancer within or outside Clinical Trials: Does the Setting Matter? A Monocentric Prospective Observational Study

Abstract

Introduction: RCTs support neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery in locally advanced esophago-gastric junction (LA-EGJ) adenocarcinoma. However, RCTs are performed in highly controlled settings with limited representativeness of real-life patients (RLS). The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes in RLS and clinical trial settings. Methods: The outcomes of RLS, which comprised 125 patients consequently treated for LA-EGJ adenocarcinoma between 2012 and 2017, were compared with the phase II trial (PIIS), performed on 65 patients from 2003 to 2011. Results: About half of RLS (51.2%) were treated with nCRT according to VR protocol, 20.8% with standard CRT according to CROSS/Al-Sarraf, 20% with chemotherapy (CT) alone. pCR was 36.8%, 28.6%, and 9.1% after VR protocol, standard CRT, and CT, respectively (p = 0.082), while 3-year overall survival (OS) was 58.6% (95% CI 43.2–71.1%), 32.8% (14.6–52.4%), and 44.8% (21.3–65.9%), respectively (p = 0.030). With respect to PIIS, RLS had a higher proportion of cN+ (94% vs. 54%; p < 0.001) and a lower proportion of pCR after CT/CRT (23% vs. 39%; p = 0.041). Three-year OS was slightly higher, although not significantly, in PIIS (58.9%, 45.1–70.2%) than RLS (47.9%, 37.4–57.7%) and nearly identical to 3-year OS in RLS treated with VR protocol. Conclusion: Real-life patients with EGJ adenocarcinoma have more advanced cancer at baseline, lower pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment than patients enrolled in clinical trials, but similar survival.