Abstract
ObjectivesFor early stage supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), single modality treatment either in the form of primary organ preservation surgery alone or radiation alone is recommended. Thus, a definite treatment strategy for early stage supraglottic SCC remains undefined. The primary objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the oncologic outcomes of surgery and radiotherapy in early stage (Stage I and II) T1 N0 and T2 N0 supraglottic SCC.MethodsSystematic methods were used to identify published and unpublished data. Two reviewers independently screened all titles, abstracts and articles for relevance using predefined criteria. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.ResultsFive studies met the inclusion criteria for disease specific mortality with a total of 2864 pooled patients. 5-year disease specific mortality was lower in the surgery group (ORs 0.43, 95% CI 0.31–0.60). Four studies met the inclusion criteria for 5-year overall mortality with a total of 2790 pooled patients. Five-year overall mortality was lower in surgery group (ORs 0.40, 95% CI 0.29–0.55).ConclusionsThis is the first study to examine the management of early stage supraglottic SCC using meta-analytic methodology. Our results suggest that primary surgery may result in decreased disease specific and overall mortality compared to primary radiotherapy.
Highlights
Early stage supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SSCC) is defined as T1 or T2, with no regional nodal spread [1]
16 studies were deemed appropriate for inclusion and the full text was reviewed
Patients who underwent Organ Preservation Surgery (OPS) had better survival outcomes compared to primary radiation therapy
Summary
Stage supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SSCC) is defined as T1 (tumor limited to one subsite of supraglottis with normal vocal cord mobility) or T2 (tumor invading more than one adjacent subsite of supraglottis or glottis or region outside of supraglottis), with no regional nodal spread [1]. Despite the poor survival of patients with early stage SSCC, there are a limited number of studies that have directly compared the survival outcomes of surgery. Patel et al Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (2018) 47:19 versus radiation for early stage SSCC [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. To date no meta-analysis comparing the survival outcomes for early stage SSCC comparing radiation and surgery has been reported. Systematically review the literature to find all the relevant studies directly comparing surgery with radiation for early stage SSSC, synthesize the results and perform meta-analysis when possible of overall survival, disease specific survival and loco-regional control
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.