Abstract

The “translation” inconsistency in the theory of nucleation is discussed in historical perspective. A theory is then developed, beginning with the classical phase integral, which not only allows all approximations to be well defined, but also leads to the most “natural” droplike model for the cluster. The theory makes it possible to apply, in a consistent manner, the thermodynamics of curved surfaces or, alternatively, moleculardynamic numerical computation schemes to the evaluation of the partition function of the cluster. If the cluster is treated as a macroscopic drop (having the free energy of a macroscopic drop), the result for the distribution of clusters differs in only a minor way from that prescribed by the conventional theory of nucleation. It is concluded that for liquid nuclei the conventional theory is consistent, but that a replacement factor may be necessary for solid nuclei. In general, however, the major problems confronting the theory involve the precise evaluation of the work of cluster formation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.