Abstract

This paper provides a utility-theoretic interpretation of “Don't-Know” (DK) responses in contingent valuation surveys using a referendum elicitation procedure. The random valuation model in this paper assumes that each respondent of a contingent valuation survey has an implicit valuation distribution, rather than a single true value as traditionally assumed, in his/her mind. If an offered referendum bid is not clearly different from the mean value of one's valuation distribution, the respondent may give a DK answer to the CV referendum question. Based on this model, a maximum likelihood procedure is proposed for estimating respondents' willingness to pay for a nonmarket good with referendum contingent valuation data which include DK responses. An empirical illustration of this estimation procedure is also provided.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call