Treatment of Dactylitis and Enthesitis in Psoriatic Arthritis with Biologic Agents: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

Abstract

Biologic agents with different mechanisms of action [inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-12/23, and IL-17] showed efficacy in randomized controlled trials (RCT) in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. We conducted a pooled metaanalysis of these agents for treatment of dactylitis and enthesitis and compared results with the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores. A systematic literature search was performed and a pooled metaanalysis of RCT with anti-TNF-α (infliximab, golimumab, adalimumab), anti-IL-12/23 (ustekinumab), and anti-IL-17 (secu kinumab, ixekizumab) was conducted using the random-effects model. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Eighteen RCT were included in the pooled analysis (n = 6981). Both TNF-α inhibitors and novel biologics (ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab) demonstrated significant resolution of dactylitis at Week 24 with pooled risk ratios (RR) versus placebo of 2.57 (95% CI 1.36-4.84) and 1.88 (95% CI 1.33-2.65), respectively. For resolution of enthesitis at Week 24, RR for TNF-α inhibitors was 1.93 (95% CI 1.33-2.79) versus 1.95 (95% CI 1.60-2.38) for novel biologics. Both biologic categories showed overlapping ranges of ACR20 responses (TNF-α inhibitors: RR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.60-3.11; pooled IL-12/23 and -17: RR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.94-2.72) and similar quality of life improvement scores with mean HAQ-DI score changes of -0.29 (95% CI -0.39 to -0.19) and -0.26 (95% CI -0.31 to -0.22), respectively. The pooled analysis demonstrated that anti-TNF-α agents have the same efficacy as novel agents (ustekinumab, secukinumab, and ixekizumab) in dactylitis and enthesitis.