Abstract
Column tests were conducted to evaluate two treatment strategies for reducing and stabilizing hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI), in chromium ore processing residue (COPR): permeation with a FeSO4–H2SO4 solution and blending with a cationic polysulfide reagent (CaSX). Cr(VI) leached at concentrations exceeding 50mg∕L from untreated COPR permeated with synthetic groundwater for >20 pore volumes of flow (PVF), and concentrations of Cr(VI) in the solid phase remained high (6,600mg∕kg). Permeation with solutions containing FeSO4–H2SO4 eliminated Cr(VI) from the effluent after initial, elevated leaching of Cr(VI) (100–1,500mg∕kg); however, high solid-phase concentrations of Cr(VI) remained in the column residuals (>1,300mg∕kg). COPR treated with CaSX leached Cr at <0.33mg∕L for 23.5 PVF and had solid-phase concentrations of Cr(VI) <10mg∕kg, although mineralogical analyses of treated solids showed potential chromate-containing mineral phases. Mineralogical analyses showed that precipitation and cementation occurred in the pore space of the COPR permeated with FeSO4–H2SO4, initially lowering the hydraulic conductivity > two orders of magnitude. However, acid dissolution channels eventually formed, resulting in preferential flow. COPR permeated with FeSO4–H2SO4 contained less brownmillerite and Cr(VI)-bearing hydrocalumite and hydrogarnet relative to untreated COPR. For COPR treated with CaSx, S encapsulated the subparticles of COPR with some micropore penetration, suggesting permanence of excess reductant after leaching with 23.5 PVF of synthetic rainwater.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have