Abstract
The management of cattle manure (CM) has become increasingly challenging because its production continues to rise, while the regulations on manure management have become increasingly stringent. In Korea, most farms produce CM as a dry mixture with lignocellulosic bedding materials (mainly sawdust), making it impractical to treat CM by anaerobic digestion. To address this problem, this study examined whether anaerobic co-digestion with food waste (FW) and pig manure (PM) could be an effective approach for the treatment of CM. The batch anaerobic digestion tests at different CM: FW: PM mixing ratios showed that more methane was produced as the FW fraction increased, and as the CM fraction decreased. The response surface models describing how the substrate mixing ratio affects the methane yield and synergistic effect (methane yield basis) were successfully generated. The models proved that the methane yield and synergistic effect respond differently to changes in the substrate mixing ratio. The maximum 30-day methane yield was predicted at 100% FW, whereas the maximum 30-day synergy index was estimated for the mixture of 47% CM, 6% FW, and 47% PM (total solids basis). The synergy index model showed that CM, FW, and PM could be co-digested without a substantial loss of their methane potential at any mixing ratio (30-day synergy index, 0.89–1.22), and that a possible antagonistic effect could be avoided by keeping the FW proportion less than 50%. The results suggest that co-digestion with PM and FW could be flexibly applied for the treatment and valorization of CM in existing anaerobic digestion plants treating FW and PM.
Highlights
The management of livestock manure has become an increasing concern for the livestock industry [1]
No significant enhancement of the ultimate digestibility is anticipated in the co-digestion of high-food waste (FW) mixtures (30-day synergy index (SI) ≤ 1), whereas the synergistic effect of co-digestion is predicted to be significant in the cattle manure (CM)/pig manure (PM) mixtures with little or no FW (30-day SI > 1) (Figure 4)
Important to note is that CM, FW, and PM could be co-digested without a substantial loss of their methane potential regardless of the substrate mixing ratio, with the
Summary
The management of livestock manure has become an increasing concern for the livestock industry [1]. Livestock manure has been traditionally managed by direct application to agricultural land and open composting, causing environmental problems such as soil/groundwater contamination and eutrophication. Anaerobic digestion (AD), which converts organic matter into biogas, is a proven technology to treat high-strength organic wastes, including livestock manure, and has been widely applied [3]. In Europe, more than 18,000 AD plants are in operation, and they produced a total of 63.5 TWh energy out of biogas in 2018 [4]. In the United States, more than 2100 AD plants, including 254 livestock manure digesters, most of which treat CM, are in operation [5]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
