Abstract

BackgroundThe management of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) patients remains controversial. Furthermore, curative attempts to treat ruptured AVM patients have not been questioned so far, and there is a lack of prospective data on clinical results according to treatment modality. Endovascular treatment is often used aiming to improve the safety or efficacy of surgery or radiation therapy, but benefits have never been documented in a trial. A care trial context is needed to evaluate interventions at the same time they are practised.Methods/Trial designTOBAS is a pragmatic, prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial and registry which offers a care trial context for brain AVM patients, including surgical resection, radiosurgery or endovascular embolization, alone or combined. The study includes two RCTs and a multimodality prospective registry. The objectives of the proposed study are to assess whether preventive interventions (surgery, embolization, radiation therapy, alone or combined), selected by the local treatment team and performed as locally practiced, randomly allocated and compared with conservative management, in unruptured brain AVM patients eligible for active or conservative management, can improve the proportion of patients having an independent outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) < 3, as assessed by a standardized questionnaire administered by non-masked care personnel) at 10 years. All patients judged ineligible for randomized allocation are to be entered in a multimodal registry. The objective of a nested trial in patients with ruptured or unruptured AVMs to be treated by surgery or radiation therapy, is to assess whether pre-surgical or pre-radiation embolization, randomly allocated and compared with no embolization, can improve the proportion of patients with complete eradication of the AVM, as locally adjudicated, combined with a good clinical outcome (mRS < 3). The study will require up to 2000 patients in approximately 30 centers or more, followed for 10 years. TOBAS is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02098252 as of 25 March 2014.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-1019-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • The management of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) patients remains controversial

  • An AVM-related seizure is reported as the presenting feature in 20–35 % of cases and these can be successfully managed with anti-epileptic agents, some AVMs lead to intractable seizures in spite of medication

  • One of the difficulties that has delayed the design of trials on AVMs is the relatively small number of heterogeneous patients treated by multiple treatment modalities, which renders well-powered randomized studies addressing specific questions on each treatment option difficult to conceive

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The management of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) patients remains controversial. Curative attempts to treat ruptured AVM patients have not been questioned so far, and there is a lack of prospective data on clinical results according to treatment modality. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex, heterogeneous, uncommon lesions that can lead to significant neurological disability or death, most commonly from intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) [1, 2]. 40, approximately 40–50 % with a hemorrhagic presentation. An AVM-related seizure is reported as the presenting feature in 20–35 % of cases and these can be successfully managed with anti-epileptic agents, some AVMs lead to intractable seizures in spite of medication. Population-based data suggest that the annual incidence of discovery of a symptomatic AVM is approximately 1 per 100,000 population [1,2,3,4,5]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call