Abstract

With advances in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT), disease relapse has replaced transplant-related mortality as the primary cause of treatment failure for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The efficacy of allo-HCT in AML is a consequence of a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect that is mediated by T lymphocytes, and unique mechanisms of immune evasion underlying post-allo-HCT AML relapses have recently been characterized. Relapsed AML following allo-HCT presents a particularly vexing clinical challenge because transplant-related toxicities, such as graft-versus-host (GVHD) and infections, increase the risk of treatment-related morbidity and mortality. In general, the prognosis of relapsed AML following allo-HCT is poor with most patients failing to achieve a subsequent remission and 2-year survival consistently <15%. The two factors that have been found to predict a better prognosis are a longer duration of post-transplant remission prior to relapse and a lower disease burden at the time of relapse. When considered in combination with a patient’s age; co-morbidities; and performance status, these factors can help to inform the appropriate therapy for the treatment of post-transplant relapse. This review discusses the options for the treatment of post-transplant AML relapse with a focus on the options to achieve a subsequent remission and consolidation with cellular immunotherapy, such as a second transplant or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). While intensive reinduction therapy and less intensive approaches with hypomethylating agents have long represented the two primary options for the initial treatment of post-transplant relapse, molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapy are emerging as potential alternative options to achieve remission. Herein, we highlight response and survival outcomes achieved specifically in the post-transplant setting using each of these approaches and discuss how some therapies may overcome the immunologic mechanisms that have been implicated in post-transplant relapse. As long-term survival in post-transplant relapse necessarily involves consolidation with cellular immunotherapy, we present data on the efficacy and toxicity of both DLI and second allo-HCT including when such therapies are integrated with reinduction. Finally, we provide our general approach to the treatment of post-transplant relapse, integrating both novel therapies and our improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying post-transplant relapse.

Highlights

  • Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant represents the most effective consolidation strategy to prevent disease relapse for the majority of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who achieve remission

  • Two separate European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) analyses demonstrate no benefit to MAC compared to reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) approaches for AML patients aged 40-60 regardless of donor type or patients ≥50 when an unrelated donor is used, as the increased incidence of relapse following RIC is offset by the increased incidence of transplant-related mortality (TRM) following MAC, yielding comparable leukemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) [4, 5]

  • AML relapse following allo-HCT is a common problem, and its management presents additional challenges compared to relapsed/ refractory AML in the non-transplant setting due to potential for residual complications from allo-HCT, especially GVHD

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) represents the most effective consolidation strategy to prevent disease relapse for the majority of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who achieve remission. An understanding of the clinical factors influencing survival following post-transplant relapse can help to set expectations and influence the choice of subsequent therapy, which may include intensive induction therapy, low-intensity therapy, targeted therapy, additional cellular immunotherapy, and novel immunotherapy agents The latter two approaches are of particular interest because the efficacy of allo-HCT in AML is primarily driven by a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect, and there is increasing recognition of unique immunologic mechanisms underlying post-allo-HCT relapse. The early detection of severely exhausted bone marrow memory T cells (PD-1+Eomes+T-bet-) predicts relapse, and memory T cells in relapsing patients have increased expression of inhibitory receptors when compared to those who maintain remission at one year [19] These findings suggest that the GVL effect is diminished when allogeneic T cells become exhausted, which can lead to relapse. We will provide our algorithm for how to use these strategies in relapsed AML patients following allo-HCT

INTENSIVE REINDUCTION THERAPY
Responses Assessed after Chemotherapy Alone
LOWER INTENSITY THERAPY
Hypomethylating Agents With DLI
Hypomethylating Agents With Venetoclax
Hypomethylating Agents With Lenalidomide
TARGETED THERAPY
Sorafenib Sorafenib
Menin Inhibitors
Withdrawal of Immunosuppression
Median Age
Checkpoint Inhibitors
CAR T Cells
NK Cell Therapy
Second Transplant
DISCUSSION
Findings
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call