Treatment of acute severe asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Danish hospitals. Do national recommendations improve on the quality of the treatment?

Abstract

Studies have demonstrated suboptimal treatment of acute severe asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease COPD). We examined the quality of treatment in Denmark and the effect of intervention, by publication of recommendations for standardised treatment. All 70 hospitals in Denmark with emergency facilities participated in a telephone questionnaire, examining treatment behaviours among house officers. The survey was repeated 3 years later, after publication of national recommendations for treatment of acute exacerbations of asthma and COPD. The response rate in both surveys was 100%. An insufficient handling of nebulisers, a huge variation in the delivered dose of bronchodilators and a suboptimal use of corticosteroids was found. A significant trend towards more liberate use of oxygen was seen in both asthma (3.2 l min −1 versus 4.8 l min −1, P<0.001) and COPD (1.5 l min −1 versus 1.9 l min −1, P=0.047). Further, a huge difference in treatment behaviours was revealed from this survey. The knowledge among house officers of basic principles of treatment was insufficient. Treatment behaviour was only moderately affected by national publication of detailed recommendations for treatment. This study indicates a need for implementing tools for quality control.