Abstract

The study objective was to evaluate the outcome of continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration (CAVH) as a first choice treatment for acute renal failure (ARF) in critically ill intensive care patients in two centres with a long experience in the field of continuous renal replacement therapies. Sixty consecutive intensive-care ARF patients from Uppsala Centre and 71 consecutive ARF patients from Vicenza Centre were included during a period of two years. Their age range was 58 +/- 16 and 52 +/- 15 years in Uppsala and Vicenza, respectively. CAVH was performed in the postdilution form using different types of hemofilters. Three choices of vascular access were utilised in each centre, namely: the Buselmeier shunt, femoral vessel catheter and the Scribner shunt. The pre-treatment serum urea level (mean +/- SD) in the Uppsala patients (30 +/- 14 mmol/l) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of the Vicenza patients (17 +/- 10 mmol/l). The Uppsala patients had a longer treatment duration than the Vicenza patients; 8 +/- 6 vs 5 +/- 5 days (p < 0.05) perhaps because they were much older than the Vicenza patients (p < 0.05) in addition to their multi-organ failure. However, the total outcome of CAVH in the two centers was not significantly different (52 and 58% patient's survival in Uppsala and Vicenza, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.