Abstract

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) represents 5.3% of in situ specimens, and is thought to carry a low risk for developing to the invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC). There is still no standard care approach for patients with LCIS. We aimed to define the impacts of surgical and radiation intervention on survival outcomes of LCIS. LCIS cases from 2004 to 2013 of the recent Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were analyzed. Clinicopathologic features were analyzed in 16002 patients between 2004 and 2013. Treatment modalities included no surgery (NS), lumpectomy alone (LA), lumpectomy with radiation treatment (LRT), mastectomy alone (MA) and mastectomy with radiation treatment (MRT). The overall survival (OS) was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the variables of treatment, race, hormone receptor status, grade and age. Among 16002 patients, median follow-up was 54 months. Patients treated with LA had superior OS for NS (P = 0.001), MA (P < 0.001) and MRT P = 0.018). LRT only had superior OS for MRT (P = 0.009). There was no statistically significance between LA and LRT (P = 0.317). Improved OS was also correlated with younger age (P < 0.001), progesterone receptor positive (P = 0.001). Black patients had the worst OS (P < 0.001). There was no obvious survival difference among grade groups (P = 0.536). The LCIS patients treated with LA or LRT had better survival comparing with other groups. Considering the medical expense and the risk of radiotherapy, LA may be the most appropriate therapy for patients with LCIS.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer in situ (BCIS) contains two distinct entities: lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

  • The LCIS patients treated with Lumpectomy Alone (LA) or LRT had better survival comparing with other groups

  • A total of 16002 women diagnosed with LCIS were included into our study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breast cancer in situ (BCIS) contains two distinct entities: lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). LCIS shares a number of similarities with atypical lobular hyperplasia. The primary difference between the two is the degree and extent of terminal duct and alveoli involvement [1,2,3]. LCIS is hard to be certain through present methods of medical examination, which can be definitively confirmed only by pathology [4, 5]. Mammography is the most sensitive imaging method in diagnosis of LCIS, with dotted microcalcification being the most common manifestation [6, 7]. Along with the constant popularization and improvement of breast cancer screening, incidence of www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call