Abstract

Objective:Chronic pain is prevalent in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). This study compared adherence and persistence rates among MDD patients with comorbid chronic pain-related diseases (CPD, including fibromyalgia, diabetes with neurological manifestations, osteoarthritis, low back pain, and headache) for three antidepressants: duloxetine, venlafaxine XR, and escitalopram.Research design and methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted of 15,523 adult MDD patients with CPD in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database who started on one of the study medications between 07/01/06 and 06/30/07. Patients were followed-up for 6 months. Adherence was reported using a medication possession ratio ≥0.8. Persistence was measured using persistence rates (proportions of patients who continuously refilled prescriptions during 6 months) and duration of therapy (number of days patients remained on the study medication before a prescription gap over 30 days). Multivariate logistic regression on adherence and persistence rates and linear regression on duration of therapy adjusting for patient and prescription characteristics were conducted.Results:Patients on duloxetine had a higher adherence rate (46.03%) than those on venlafaxine XR (42.94%; p = 0.0033) or escitalopram (37.27%; p < 0.0001). Patients on duloxetine also had a higher persistence rate and longer duration of therapy (43.66%, 117.82 days) than did patients treated with venlafaxine XR (40.38%; p = 0.0017; 114.24 days; p = 0.009) or escitalopram (33.86%; p < 0.0001; 105.73 days; p < 0.0001). These differences were still significant after adjusting for patient and prescription characteristics (p < 0.05). Sensitivity analyses found similar patterns using an allowable gap for refill of 15 days.Conclusions:Among commercially insured MDD patients with CPD, duloxetine-treated patients had higher adherence and persistence rates than did patients treated with venlafaxine XR or escitalopram during 6 months after medication initiation. Future studies should examine the clinical and economic implications of these differences.Limitations:This study has limitations such as possible selection bias using secondary database analysis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.