Abstract
ABSTRACT Spin–orbit coupling (SOC) in EOM-CCSD calculations can be treated in SCF step (SOC-EOM-CCSD), in both the CCSD and EOM steps (EOM-CCSD(SOC)), only in the EOM step (EOM(SOC)-CCSD) or perturbatively (pSOC-EOM-CCSD). In this work, we report implementation of pSOC-EOM-CCSD based on the EOM(SOC)-CCSD program by directly calculating the SOC matrix between two states without using the transition density matrix. Computational cost of pSOC-EOM-CCSD can be further reduced particularly for excited states by using only the r-amplitudes (rpSOC-EOM-CCSD). Accuracy of EOM-CCSD(SOC) is evaluated by comparing its results with those of SOC-EOM-CCSD for heavy and superheavy elements. Highly accurate results are obtained with EOM-CCSD(SOC) for elements up to the sixth-row, and reasonable results are achieved for superheavy elements when contribution of the 7p1/2 spinor to the involved occupied orbitals is insignificant. Performance of EOM(SOC)-CCSD, and (r)pSOC-EOM-CCSD is investigated by comparing their results with those of EOM-CCSD(SOC). According to our results, EOM(SOC)-CCSD is not necessarily more accurate than the perturbative methods and should not be used. Difference between rpSOC-EOM-CCSD and pSOC-EOM-CCSD is small and rpSOC-EOM-CCSD is an economical and reliable method in treating SOC effects particularly for excited states for systems containing elements up to the fifth row.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.