Abstract

ABSTRACT Smalt is a blue cobalt-coloured glass pigment used in European wall paintings from the early Renaissance period that became a popular choice for artists due to its unique tone, availability, and versatility. The pigment has long been considered as stable in an alkaline environment since it was applied with lime-based techniques and generally retained its colour over time. This perceived stability has meant that aqueous-based alkaline treatments, often involving high pH values, substantial quantities of liquid, and long contact times, have been used in conservation treatments. However, studies of the kinetics of glass deterioration in the past few years have demonstrated that glass is highly reactive in contact with water and substances with both high and low pH values. Research into smalt deterioration in canvas paintings has shown that smalt is susceptible to elemental leaching and physical changes in contact with water and low pH values; however, there is little specific information about the conservation implications of these findings on the treatment of smalt in wall paintings. This experimental study explores several aspects of how aqueous-based alkaline conservation treatments affect smalt grains in lime-based wall paintings: the influence of painting technique, exposure of the pictorial layer to water before treatment, and pH values and contact times during treatment. Replicas representing three different painting techniques were created, exposed to liquid water or water vapour, and treated with three substances commonly used in conservation according to accepted practices in terms of preparation and application. Chemical and physical changes in the pigment were then analysed using scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Results confirmed that aqueous-based alkaline substances provoke chemical changes as well as physical deterioration in smalt applied in lime-based techniques evidenced by leaching, corrosion, and cracking in the pigment grains. Crucial factors found to influence the impact of treatments on smalt included the previous exposure to humidity of the pictorial layer, the pH value of the treatment, and extended contact times.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call