Abstract

This study claims that the roots of the symptomatic ‘madness’ found in the Syrian-Christian Kottayam family in The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy traverse beyond the general postcolonial identity crisis. It investigates the self-destructive element hidden within this family that obviously had an impact on Ammu, Chako, Baby Kochamma and others in developing some form of self-annihilation, which cannot be simply attributed to postcolonial identity politics. The authors find that the ‘dual identity’ (symbiosis) (Bhabha, 1994), the ‘disconnectivity’ (Jameson, 1991) and ‘death as a pathway to rebirth’ (Holbrook, 1971) experienced by the Kottayam family force the authors’ reading of the novel to go beyond postcolonial discourse and exploit Žižekian psychoanalytic tools. The death drive and self-annihilation that run within the family members, which distance them from the rest of the contemporary Kerala society, demand a broad universal analysis of the text. The only rebel in The God of Small Things, Ammu, who ‘radically annihilated her existence’ by loving an untouchable, ends up in a tragic Žižekian misrecognition. Her act is, therefore, an attempt of escapism from the false deadlock of stagnating identity politics that made her life quite miserable and un-liberating. Though there are substantial features of discursive success throughout the novel, Roy’s own failure and inability to contextualise India in a universal emancipatory stream is widely evidenced by the symbolic deaths in her ‘imaginary’ (yet empirical) family.

Highlights

  • Defining post-colonialism involves various attempts to conceptualise the ‘post’ experience of societies subjected to the historical circumstances of imperialism

  • This study claims that the roots of the symptomatic ‘madness’ found in the Syrian-Christian Kottayam family in The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy traverse beyond the general postcolonial identity crisis

  • It investigates the selfdestructive element hidden within this family that obviously had an impact on Ammu, Chako, Baby Kochamma and others in developing some form of self-annihilation, which cannot be attributed to postcolonial identity politics

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Defining post-colonialism involves various attempts to conceptualise the ‘post’ experience of societies subjected to the historical circumstances of imperialism. The immediate resonance is the marginal position of the Syrian Christians in a dominant Hindu culture, and the isolation, fear, non-homogenous affiliations that it creates in the social sphere, not forgetting the ‘experiment’ in language Roy creates in the novel, possibly resonating from the author’s architectural inclination towards an interest in form and structure All this makes Roy’s work unique amidst other Indian writers, in addition to the fact that she continues to live in India, unlike other renowned Indian authors, i.e., Naipaul and Rushdie, and her writing reflects the engagements and traumas of the postcolonial subject with a clear ‘insider-outsider’ (Bishop, 1992) perspective. The depiction of woman in the Syrian Christian household in Roy’s novel proves that woman cannot go ‘beyond the phallus’ or if she ever tries to ‘go beyond her official position’ (Žižek, 2011), what is opted is an inevitable death

OBJECTIVES
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call