Abstract

We study wavefield effects of direct P- and S -waves in elastic and isotropic 3-D seismic structures derived from the temperature field of a high-resolution mantle circulation model. More specifically, we quantify the dispersion of traveltime residuals caused by diffraction in structures with dynamically constrained length scales and magnitudes of the lateral variations in seismic velocities and density. 3-D global wave propagation is simulated using a spectral element method. Intrinsic attenuation (i.e. dissipation of seismic energy) is deliberately neglected, so that any variation of traveltimes with frequency can be attributed to structural effects. Traveltime residuals are measured at 15, 22.5, 34 and 51 s dominant periods by cross- correlation of 3-D and 1-D synthetic waveforms. Additional simulations are performed for a model in which 3-D structure is removed in the upper 800 km to isolate the dispersion signal of the lower mantle. We find that the structural length scales inherent to a vigorously convecting mantle give rise to significant diffraction-induced body-wave traveltime dispersion. For both P- and S-waves, the difference between long-period and short-period residuals for a given source–receiver pair can reach up to several seconds for the period bands considered here. In general, these ‘differential-frequency’ residuals tend to increase in magnitude with increasing short-period delay. Furthermore, the long-period signal typically is smaller in magnitude than the short-period one; that is, wave-front healing is efficient independent of the sign of the residuals. Unlike the single-frequency residuals, the differential-frequency residuals are sur- prisingly similar between the ‘lower-mantle’ and the ‘whole-mantle’ model for corresponding source–receiver pairs. The similarity is more pronounced in case of S -waves and varies between different combinations of period bands. The traveltime delay acquired in the upper mantle seems to cancel in these differential signals depending on the associated wavelengths and the length scales of structure at shallow depth. Differential-frequency residuals may thus prove useful to precondition tomographic inversions for the lower-mantle structure such as to reduce the influence of the upper mantle for certain length scales. Overall, standard deviations of the diffraction-induced traveltime dispersion between the longest (51 s) and the shortest (15 s) period considered here are 0.6 and 1.0 s for P - and S -waves, respectively. For comparison, the corresponding standard deviations of the 15 s residuals are 1.0 s and 2.8 s. In the lower-mantle model, standard deviations are 0.3 and 0.6 s, respectively, which gives an average lower-mantle contribution to the total dispersion of 50 per cent for P -waves and 60 per cent for S -waves.

Highlights

  • Detailed knowledge of the seismic structure of Earth’s mantle is of fundamental importance for understanding its dynamics and in particular to quantify the buoyancy forces that drive convection

  • We follow the approach of Schuberth et al (2012): Synthetic 3-D wavefields and seismograms are obtained from simulations of global seismic wave propagation through geodynamic models of mantle heterogeneity

  • The main result of this study is that mantle structures with length scales that are controlled by the dynamics of flow lead to significant diffraction-induced traveltime dispersion for P- and S-waves

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Detailed knowledge of the seismic structure of Earth’s mantle is of fundamental importance for understanding its dynamics and in particular to quantify the buoyancy forces that drive convection. Both magnitude and inherent length scales of seismic heterogeneity bear key information on the underlying lateral variations in temperature and chemical composition. Nolet to the mantle is the thickness of subducted oceanic lithosphere, which is on the order of 100 km This thickness reflects the upper thermal boundary layer of the convective system and is governed by the temperature gradient across the lithosphere as well as material parameters such as thermal diffusivity, coefficient of thermal expansion, and viscosity. The distribution and length scales of chemical heterogeneities and their influence on the dynamics of the mantle, are still a matter of debate (Christensen & Hofmann 1994; Davaille 1999; Kellogg et al 1999; Tackley 2000; Hansen & Yuen 2000; Montague & Kellogg 2000; Davaille et al 2002; Stegman et al 2002; Jellinek & Manga 2004; Nakagawa & Tackley 2004; McNamara & Zhong 2005; Tan & Gurnis 2007; Bull et al 2009; Schuberth et al 2009a,b; Simmons et al 2010; Davies et al 2012; Mosca et al 2012; Schuberth et al 2012; Li & McNamara 2013; Li et al 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.