Travel burdens to access care among children with cancer between 2016 and 2019: Analysis of a national population-based cancer registry in Japan.

Abstract

Centralization of cancer care increases survival but increases the travel burden (i.e., travel durations, distances, and expenditures) in visiting hospitals. This study investigated the travel burdens to access cancer care for children aged 18 years and younger in Japan. The study population comprised 10,709 patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2019 obtained from a national population-based cancer registry in Japan. Their residences were classified as urban or rural. We counted the number of patients treated at specialized hospitals and investigated the treatment centralization across diagnostic groups by Pareto plot. Travel burdens to access care were estimated using a route-planner web service and summarized using median values. A multivariable logistic model was performed to investigate factors associated with the events of car travel duration exceeding 1 h. Of the patients, 76.7% lived in urban areas, and 82.5% received treatment in designated hospitals for childhood cancer. The Pareto plot suggested that the top five hospitals treated 63.5% of patients with retinoblastoma. The estimated travel burdens for all patients were 0.62 h (0.57 h in urban areas and 1.00 h in rural areas), 16.9 km, and 0.0 dollars of toll charges. Regarding travel duration, 21.7% of patients had travel exceeding 1 h, and rural areas, retinoblastoma, malignant bone tumors, and childhood cancer-hub hospitals were associated with travel duration exceeding 1 h (adjusted odds ratios of 6.93, 3.59, 1.94, and 1.91, respectively). Most patients were treated in specialized hospitals and the treatments for specific diseases were centralized. However, most patients were estimated to travel less than 1 h, and the travel burden tended to increase for patients in rural areas, those with specific diseases, and those going to specialized hospitals. Cancer control measures in Japan have steadily improved centralized treatment while keeping the travel burden relatively manageable.