Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) may experience significant postoperative pain due to the extensive approach and multiple osteotomies. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on reducing opioid consumption and improving clinical outcome in PAO patients. Patients and Methods: We conducted a two-group randomized-controlled trial in 42 consecutive patients undergoing a PAO for symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The study group received an ultrasound-guided TAP block with 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine prior to surgery. The control group did not receive a TAP block. All patients received a multimodal analgesia with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (etoricoxib and metamizole) and an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with piritramide (1.5 mg bolus, 10 min lockout-time). The primary endpoint was opioid consumption within 48 h after surgery. Secondary endpoints were pain scores, assessment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), measurement of the quality of recovery using patient-reported outcome measure and length of hospital stay. Forty-one patients (n = 21 TAP block group, n = 20 control group) completed the study, per protocol. One patient was lost to follow-up. Thirty-three were women (88.5%) and eight men (19.5%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 28 years (18–43, SD ± 7.4). All TAP blocks were performed by an experienced senior anaesthesiologist and all operations were performed by a single, high volume surgeon. Results: The opioid consumption in the TAP block group was significantly lower compared to the control group at 6 (3 mg ± 2.8 vs. 10.8 mg ± 5.6, p < 0.0001), 24 (18.4 ± 16.2 vs. 30.8 ± 16.4, p = 0.01) and 48 h (29.1 mg ± 30.7 vs. 54.7 ± 29.6, p = 0.04) after surgery. Pain scores were significantly reduced in the TAP block group at 24 h after surgery. There were no other differences in secondary outcome parameters. No perioperative complication occurred in either group. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided TAP block significantly reduces the perioperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing PAO.

Highlights

  • Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an established and effective regional analgesic procedure, infiltrating the Nn. ilioinguinalis, iliohypogastricus and spinal nerves of the anterolateral abdominal wall in the plane between internal oblique (IOAM) and transversus abdominis muscle (TAM) with local anaesthetics (LA) [1]

  • The opioid consumption in the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block group was significantly lower compared to the control group at 6 (3 mg ± 2.8 vs. 10.8 mg ± 5.6, p < 0.0001), 24 (18.4 ± 16.2 vs. 30.8 ± 16.4, p = 0.01) and 48 h (29.1 mg ± 30.7 vs. 54.7 ± 29.6, p = 0.04)

  • The main finding of this study was that the mean postoperative opioid consumption in the TAP block group was significantly lower compared to the control group at 6 (p < 0.0001), 24 (p = 0.01) and 48 h (p = 0.04) (Figure 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an established and effective regional analgesic procedure, infiltrating the Nn. ilioinguinalis, iliohypogastricus and spinal nerves of the anterolateral abdominal wall in the plane between internal oblique (IOAM) and transversus abdominis muscle (TAM) with local anaesthetics (LA) [1]. Providing an effective postoperative pain management and reducing opioid consumption and the associated adverse effects remains challenging in PAO patients. Different management approaches have been reported using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with opioids, epidural anaesthesia (EA) and local (periarticular and/or surgical site) infiltration analgesia (LIA) [9,10,11]. Both PCA and EA are known to cause postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and drowsiness [9,12]. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on reducing opioid consumption and improving clinical outcome in PAO patients. The mean age at the time of surgery was 28 years (18–43, SD ± 7.4)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call