Transtibial technique versus two incisions in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: tunnel positioning, isometricity and functional evaluation

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the transtibial and two-incision techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a single band. MethodsA prospective and randomized study was conducted in blocks. Patients underwent ACL reconstruction by means of two techniques: transtibial (group 1: 20 patients) or two incisions (group 2: 20 patients). The radiographic positioning of the tunnel, inclination of the graft, graft isometricity and functional results (IKDC and Lysholm) were evaluated. ResultsThe positioning of the femoral tunnel on the anteroposterior radiograph, expressed as a mean percentage relative to the medial border of the tibial plateau, was 54.6% in group 1 and 60.8% in group 2 (p<0.05). The positioning of the femoral tunnel on the lateral radiograph, expressed as a mean percentage relative to the anterior border of Blumensaat's line, was 68.4% in group 1 and 58% in group 2 (p<0.05). The mean inclination of the graft was 19° in group 1 and 27.2° in group 2 (p<0.05). The mean graft isometricity was 0.96mm in group 1 and 1.33mm in group 2 (p>0.05). Group 2 had better results from the pivot-shift maneuver (p<0.05). ConclusionThe technique of two incisions allowed positioning of the femoral tunnel that was more lateralized and anteriorized, such that the graft was more inclined and there was a clinically better result from the pivot-shift maneuver. There was no difference in isometricity and no final functional result over the short follow-up time evaluated.