Abstract
A relevance of research is recent trend in regrouping forces in the global financial arena with transregional unions based on fictive capital’ expansion. The objective of this research is revisal of transregional integration conditions by the analysis of modern geopolitical aims of the world financial system’s leaders and also it is practical recommendations forming to prevent the Russian economy trapping by the fictive capital of transregional unions. It has been shown that the global finance circulation model is drastically changing - trade and economic unions like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership or Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership are aimed at forming the markets for goods, works and services produced in countries, which have been proclaimed as the world financial centres. That politics doesn’t allow to develop industry and it arrive to financial bubbles at branches of economy, which are cooperated with transregional financial flows. For the leaders of transregional groups, it’s a way to solve geopolitical problems with financial methods shifting responsibility for their mistakes in industrial policy. There are significant features of the east and west leaders dominance in transregional unions in the article. These are respectively hub infrastructure dependence and currency speculations. The conclusion is it should be formed a secured non-speculative currency in transregional union for geopolitical dependence eliminate. Besides the only reason for infrastructure international project realize could be an economic efficiency. These conclusions are very important for the modern stage of the globalization.
Highlights
The object of management is not the supply and the level of costs, but the possibility of the demand generation for products and services offered by the leading countries of world trade
The objective of this research is revisal of transregional integration conditions by the analysis of modern geopolitical aims of the world financial system’s leaders and it is practical recommendations forming to prevent the Russian economy trapping by the fictive capital of transregional unions
Summing up the comparison of the western and eastern models of managing international transport corridors, it should be noted that despite the different instruments, the final objectives are similar in many ways - using the potential and economic resources of other countries to overcome internal crises
Summary
The object of management is not the supply and the level of costs, but the possibility of the demand generation for products and services offered by the leading countries of world trade. In this context, two practical aspects of common markets formation energy, with the participation of Russia, are important: 1. Developed models of common markets include mainly commodity sellers and transport services. If the directions of the movement of added value are determined by the trends in the development of transregional groupings, it is necessary to manage the level of added value in export positions through internal measures
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
