Transradial vs transfemoral access in patients with hepatic malignancy and undergoing hepatic interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Background:The aim of this study was to compare transradial access (TRA) approach with transfemoral access (TFA) approach in patients undergoing hepatic interventions.Methods:We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database to identify relevant available articles. Patients’ preference, success rate, intra- and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The risk difference (RD), relative risk (RR), and weighted mean difference (WMD) values were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used RevMan 5.3 to perform the pooled analyses.Results:Nine cohort studies were included. A total of 1096 procedures were performed in 877 patients. Of those, 545 procedures (49.7%) were performed by TRA, and 551 procedures (50.3%) were performed by TFA. Patients were significantly prefer the TRA (86.5%) to the TFA (13.5%) (RD = 0.88, P < .00001). The procedure time in TRA groups was longer (WMD = 3.36, 95% CI 1.24–5.47, P = .002). But there were no significant difference in terms of success rate, fluoroscopy time, radiation dosage, contrast volume, and postoperative vascular complications.Conclusion:For patients suffer from primary or secondary hepatic malignancy and undergoing hepatic interventions, the present meta-analysis demonstrated that patients prefer the TRA approach to the TFA approach. But the procedure time is longer in TRA group.