Abstract
STUDIES in the field of pupil transportation conducted in the period covered by this issue of the REVIEW tended to emphasize the financial aspects of the program. Formerly local units met most of the cost of the program but as it expanded many states assumed a part of this responsibility. The general pattern has been for special state aid for transportation costs and the inclusion of these costs in the foundation program, a part of which was met by state aid. In most cases the greater share of the financial burden has continued to be carried by the local unit. Recent studies suggested that the state should be responsible for the greater share of the cost of pupil transportation under the equalization program.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
