Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to transport project assessment in terms of feasibility risk assessment and reference class forecasting. Conventionally, transport project assessment is based upon a Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) where evaluation criteria such as Benefit Cost Ratios (BCR) are obtained. Recent research has however proved that substantial inaccuracies are present when obtaining the monetary input to the CBA, particularly as concerns the construction costs and demand forecasts. This paper proposes a new approach in order to address these inaccuracies in a so-called Reference Scenario Forecasting (RSF) frame. The RSF is anchored in the cost-benefit analysis; thus, it provides decision-makers with a quantitative mean of assessing the transport infrastructure project. First, the RSF method introduces uncertainties within the CBA by applying Optimism Bias uplifts on the preliminary construction cost estimates. Hereafter, a quantitative risk analysis is provided making use of Monte Carlo simulation. This approach facilitates random input parameters based upon reference class forecasting, hence, a parameter data fit has been performed in order to obtain validated probability distribution functions. The latter have been placed and ultimately simulated on the inaccuracies of determining demand forecasts, i.e. leading to travel time savings and ticket revenues of the project. Finally, RSF makes use of scenario forecasting where trend scenarios such as economic growth and level of cross-border integration are investigated. The latter is highly relevant as RSF is demonstrated by a case example concerning the fixed link between Elsinore in Denmark and Helsingborg in Sweden.

Highlights

  • This paper lays out a new approach to the assessment of transport infrastructure projects in terms of evaluating the embedded model uncertainties

  • Point estimates in terms of Net Present Values (NPV), Benefit Cost Ratios (BCR), IRR

  • The UNITE-DSS model applies a set of Danish unit prices and the guidelines formulated by the Danish Ministry of Transport (DMT 2003)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper lays out a new approach to the assessment of transport infrastructure projects in terms of evaluating the embedded model uncertainties. Conventional transport infrastructure project assessments are based upon cost-benefit analyses in order to appraise whether the project is feasible or not in terms of Net Present Values (NPV), Benefit Cost Ratios (BCR), etc. Mackie, Preston (1998) points to 21 sources of uncertainties or biases in transport project appraisals present in the use of conventional Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA). The QRA technique is therein supplemented with Reference Class Forecasting (RCF) depicting the historical tendency of overestimating transport related benefits (user demands i.e. travel time savings) and underestimating investment costs (Flyvbjerg et al 2003; Flyvbjerg 2007; Odeck 2010; Cantarelli et al 2010; Welde, Odeck 2011). From these classes they developed a set of uplift values (in percentage) to be placed on the preliminary investment denoted as Optimism Bias uplifts (Flyvbjerg 2004)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call