Abstract

This chapter discusses the policy tensions that occurred at multiple levels in the planned development of a BRT project in Surabaya. International development organisations advocated the BRT project as a solution to urban transport problems and as part of Indonesia’s global climate change mitigation strategy. The Surabayan government, with strong support from various international development agencies, international NGOs and central government ministries, developed technical knowledge of transport issues and of BRT as a solution for the city. However, this top-down and technocratic approach to dealing with urban transport problems failed when the city’s political leadership changed, eventually leading to rejection of the BRT project and its replacement with a monorail project. This situation was triggered by a lack of communication and a failure to build partnerships with local actors. The complexities of BRT decision-making in Surabaya show that the socio-political power of local politicians, along with the support of discursive storylines, can challenge the institutional-financial power of central government and international development agencies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call