Abstract

The standard procedure to identify the hole- or electron-acceptor character of amorphous organic materials used in OLEDs is to look at the values of a pair of basic parameters, namely, the ionization potential (IP) and the electron affinity (EA). Recently, using published experimental data, the present authors showed that only IP matters, i.e., materials with IP > 5.7 (<5.7) showing electron (hole) acceptor character. Only three materials fail to obey this rule. This work reports ab initio calculations of IP and EA of those materials plus two materials that behave according to that rule, following a route which describes the organic material by means of a single molecule embedded in a polarizable continuum medium (PCM) characterized by a dielectric constant . PCM allows to approximately describe the extended character of the system. This “compound” system was treated within density functional theory (DFT) using several combinations of the functional/basis set. In the preset work was derived by assuming Koopmans’ theorem to hold. Optimal values are in the range 4.4–5.0, close to what is expected for this material family. It was assumed that the optical gap corresponds to the excited state with a large oscillator strength among those with the lowest energies, calculated with time-dependent DFT. Calculated exciton energies were in the range 0.76–1.06 eV, and optical gaps varied from 3.37 up to 4.50 eV. The results are compared with experimental data.

Highlights

  • The standard procedure to identify the hole- or electron-acceptor character of amorphous organic materials (AOM) is to look at the values of a pair of basic parameters, namely, the ionization potential (IP) and the electron affinity (EA)

  • [1,2], albeit, this rule of thumb is based upon rather solid grounds, its key drawback is a technical one; while IP is measured by means of direct ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS), EA

  • Is manifested clearly in the stronger effects it has on the parameters of the charged system (IP and EA) than on those of the neutral system (EHOMO and ELUMO )

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The standard procedure to identify the hole- or electron-acceptor character of amorphous organic materials (AOM) is to look at the values of a pair of basic parameters, namely, the ionization potential (IP) and the electron affinity (EA). It is widely accepted that those having high IP, EA will mainly act as an electron-acceptor, whereas those with low IP, EA are expected to behave as hole-acceptors [1,2], albeit, this rule of thumb is based upon rather solid grounds, its key drawback is a technical one; while IP is measured by means of direct ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS), EA requires inverse UPS, a technique not that simple and/or accessible These difficulties force many researchers to derive EA indirectly through the measurement of the optical gap, a procedure that may introduce an error as high as 1 eV (the exciton binding energy) in organic materials. Such a plot indicated that, except for three molecules, all others are separated into two groups: those having an IP > 5.7 eV corresponding to electron-acceptors, while hole-acceptors are confined to the region

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call