Abstract

The perception that transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells can confer tolerance to any tissue or organ from the same donor is widely accepted but it has not yet become a treatment option in clinical routine. The reasons for this are multifaceted but can generally be classified into safety and efficacy concerns that also became evident from the results of the first clinical pilot trials. In comparison to standard immunosuppressive therapies, the infection risk associated with the cytotoxic pre-conditioning necessary to allow allogeneic bone marrow engraftment and the risk of developing graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) constitute the most prohibitive hurdles. However, several approaches have recently been developed at the experimental level to reduce or even overcome the necessity for cytoreductive conditioning, such as costimulation blockade, pro-apoptotic drugs, or Treg therapy. But even in the absence of any hazardous pretreatment, the recipients are exposed to the risk of developing GVHD as long as non-tolerant donor T cells are present. Total lymphoid irradiation and enriching the stem cell graft with facilitating cells emerged as potential strategies to reduce this peril. On the other hand, the long-lasting survival of kidney allografts, seen with transient chimerism in some clinical series, questions the need for durable chimerism for robust tolerance. From a safety point of view, loss of chimerism would indeed be favorable as it eliminates the risk of GVHD, but also complicates the assessment of tolerance. Therefore, other biomarkers are warranted to monitor tolerance and to identify those patients who can safely be weaned off immunosuppression. In addition to these safety concerns, the limited efficacy of the current pilot trials with approximately 40–60% patients becoming tolerant remains an important issue that needs to be resolved. Overall, the road ahead to clinical routine may still be rocky but the first successful long-term patients and progress in pre-clinical research provide encouraging evidence that deliberately inducing tolerance through hematopoietic chimerism might eventually make it from dream to reality.

Highlights

  • Reviewed by: Alain Le Moine, Free University of Brussels, Belgium Baojun Zhang, Duke University, United States

  • In comparison to standard immunosuppressive therapies, the infection risk associated with the cytotoxic pre-conditioning necessary to allow allogeneic bone marrow engraftment and the risk of developing graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) constitute the most prohibitive hurdles

  • A myriad of mouse studies established bone marrow transplantation as promising approach to achieve donor-specific transplantation tolerance [7]. The usability of this approach was corroborated by anecdotal cases in which patients developed immunological tolerance to a renal allograft after having previously received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant from the same donor for a hematological disorder [8]

Read more

Summary

Tolerance through Mixed Chimerism

Transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage organ failure [1, 2] as it improves their survival and quality of life [3]. The usability of this approach was corroborated by anecdotal cases in which patients developed immunological tolerance to a renal allograft after having previously received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant from the same donor for a hematological disorder [8]. In contrast to conventional kidney allograft recipients, patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the purpose of tolerance induction are exposed to a considerable risk of developing GvHD. Conventional, clinically obtainable, doses of fully allogeneic bone marrow engraft in non-irradiated mice under costimulation blockade and rapamycin if in vitro activated Tregs from the recipient are administered at the time of donor bone marrow transplantation [49]. Generation α-CD40L antibodies lacking thromboembolic side effects have shown promise in preclinical development and might become an option for use in tolerance protocols in the future [55]

Graft Composition
Chimerism Type
Boston Group
Stanford Group
Northwestern Group
UNDERSTANDING THE MECHANISMS OF TOLERANCE
FUTURE PROSPECTS
REMAINING HURDLES
TOLERANCE OR NO TOLERANCE THAT IS THE QUESTION
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call