Abstract
A study was carried out to investigate whether human RPE allografts are tolerated or rejected in the subretinal space and to determine the feasibility of RPE transplantation in subjects with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Patches of human fetal RPE (13-20 weeks of gestational age) were transplanted into the subretinal space of five patients after surgical removal of subfoveal fibrovascular membranes, and to four subjects with dry geographic atrophy. Suspensions of RPE cells were transplanted to four other patients with nonexudative AMD. Results were evaluated with clinical ophthalmological examination, SLO microperimetry and fluorescein angiography over 8-20 months. In disciform lesions, RPE transplants developed macular edema and fluorescein leakage concomitant with gradual reduction of visual acuity, implying host-graft rejection, over 1-6 months. In geographic atrophy, three of four transplants showed little change in shape and size after 12 months (one transplant was slowly rejected). In non-exudative AMD, RPE suspension transplants showed no evidence of rejection and were associated with the disappearance of drusen; visual acuity remained stable and SLO microperimetry confirmed retinal function over the transplanted area. Human RPE allografts are not invariably rejected in the subretinal space without immunosuppression. The rejection rate is lower in nonexudative than in neovascular AMD. An intact blood-retinal barrier is likely to protect against rejection. It is technically feasible to transplant human RPE into the submacular space without adversely affecting visual function in nonexudative AMD over relatively long periods of time.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.