Abstract

The study deals with measuring the investment environment transparency for responsible investment, assessing it in Ukraine, and improving it through the rating means in sustainable development. There are ratings, rankings, indices, benchmarks and sustainable development standards as unique markers in responsible investment markets, considering the ESG − criteria for screening companies. The authors prove that ratings are tools for minimizing information asymmetry at the micro and macro levels, which is quite significant, especially in the responsible investment field. Rating is a leading factor in creating a transparent environment for investment decisions and ensuring a favorable investment climate in the world (considering the sustainable development ratings and progress towards sustainable development) and the investment attractiveness of companies (considering ESG − reporting criteria on sustainable development of companies). The authors pay much attention to the world’s sustainable development ratings, which incorporate the transparency component of the investment environment. The authors analyze Ukraine’s position in these rankings and conclude that its status and investment attractiveness are deteriorating in the international arena, particularly due to insufficient transparency of the investment environment, perception of corporate social responsibility and weak progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Structural and dynamic analysis of the signatories and participants of the UN Global Compact network in Ukraine confirm this thesis. Despite the positive dynamics of network members, especially in recent years, their number and composition are unrepresentative towards companies, financial sector institutions, NGOs and government organizations as leaders in the values of sustainable development and social responsibility in Ukraine. Consideration of the European countries’ experience embodied in the new EU investment plan, comprising three areas and ten measures aimed at mobilizing 650 billion euros of investment in sustainable development and the investigations made by a supranational organizations network (OECD, UN Development Program, the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board). The Global Reporting Initiative, the International Finance Corporation, the Global Impact Investing Network, and other stakeholders are essential steps in increasing Ukraine’s investment environment transparency. Ensuring environment transparency of the responsible investment by introducing methods of ranking companies and countries considering their social responsibility and achievements in the sustainable development field and its goals, standardization of products, techniques and strategies of responsible investment are key priorities of Ukrainian state investment policy. Keywords: Transparency, Investment Environment, Information Asymmetry, Ranking, Sustainable Development, Responsible Investing.

Highlights

  • The growing trend in the field of responsible investment (RI) in the last decade is accompanied by the growth of information and rating infrastructure and intermediaries in the RI markets, which perform ESG - analysis of data on sustainable development of companies (Vigeo, EIRIS, MSCI, SustainAlytics)

  • As an element that contributes to the investment environment transparency, ratings allow stakeholders, primarily investors, to investigate the state of investment objects based on the formalized system of criteria

  • Ratings are considered one of the most effective ways to reduce information asymmetry, which is quite relevant in the RI markets given the lack of field standardization and investment technologies interpretation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The growing trend in the field of responsible investment (RI) in the last decade is accompanied by the growth of information and rating infrastructure and intermediaries in the RI markets, which perform ESG - analysis of data on sustainable development of companies (Vigeo, EIRIS, MSCI, SustainAlytics). The key method of forming a transparent RI environment and leveling such information asymmetry methods as rating and benchmarking is sustainable development reporting.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call