Abstract

Introduction O VER the past decade there has been considerable progress in the development of numerical simulation techniques for unsteady transonic flow calculations. This activity was motivated by the need to supplement the expensive and time-consuming wind-tunnel investigations and flight tests with inexpensive, fast, and efficient computer simulation programs to accurately predict flutter boundaries and many other important aeroelastic phenomena in the transonic regime. Although the basic fluid motion in unsteady aerodynamics is governed by the Navier-Stokes (NS) equations, numerical simulations of the complete NS equations for general threedimensional flow problems are not yet sufficiently developed for flutter applications. Computational methods in threedimensional unsteady transonic flows concentrate mainly on the transonic small disturbance (TSD) equation or full potential (FP) equation. The major advantage of the simpler model using TSD or FP approach over those based on Euler and NS formulation is the large reduction in computational time and memory requirements. In Ref. 1, the TSD code UST3D was described. This code utilizes the time-linearization approach for solving the transonic small disturbance equation. It was demonstrated that the technique could be used with confidence for computations of three-dimensional unsteady transonic flows over an isolated thin wing. An improved version of the UST3D program was given in Ref. 2 and results from a validation study were presented. This transonic aerodynamics code was incorporated into the Institute for Aerospace Research (IAR) Flutter Analysis Program. This Note presents some results from an aerodynamic and flutter analysis of the AGARD 445.6 wing which was recommended by AGARD as a standard configuration for code validation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call