Abstract

Transnational research networks (TRN) are becoming increasingly complex. Such complexity may have both positive and negative effects on the quality of research. Our work studies the evolution over time of Chinese TRN and the role of complexity on the quality of Chinese research, given the leading role this country has recently acquired in international science. We focus on the fields of geriatrics and gerontology. We build an original dataset of all scientific publications of China in these areas in 2009, 2012 and 2015, starting from the ISI Web of Knowledge (ISI WoK) database. Using Social Network Analysis (SNA), we analyze the change in scientific network structure across time. Second, we design indices to control for the different aspects of networks complexity (number of authors, country heterogeneity and institutional heterogeneity) and we perform negative binomial regressions to identify the main determinants of research quality. Our analysis shows that research networks in the field of geriatrics and gerontology have gradually become wider in terms of countries and have become more balanced. Furthermore, our results identify that different forms of complexity have different impacts on quality, including a reciprocal moderating effect. In particular, according to our analysis, research quality benefits from complex research networks both in terms of countries and of types of institutions involved, but that such networks should be “compact” in terms of number of authors. Eventually, we suggest that complexity should be carefully taken into account when designing policies aimed at enhancing the quality of research.

Highlights

  • In the modern age, science is characterized by a generalized enlargement of research networks.The number of authors taking part in a single publication has increased

  • To study the way in which complexity affects the quality of research, we identified three dimensions of network complexity: number of authors, institutional heterogeneity and country heterogeneity

  • Concerning our three dimensions of complexity, the institutional heterogeneity does not affect quality, while country’s heterogeneity is significant only in the second formulation, when we introduce the interaction terms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The number of authors taking part in a single publication has increased. In particular for medical sciences, we observe that the average number of authors per article in PubMed has passed from 2.0 in 1970 to 5.3 in 2010 [1]. In 2010 almost 25% of research articles included authors from at least two countries (against 10% in 1990) [8]. Scientific cooperation networks have increasingly included several researchers from different countries. They have recently seen the contribution of authors coming from different types of institutions, with different general goals and organization [10]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.