Abstract

Global economic governance outcomes in areas such as corporate taxation may be influenced by transnational policy communities acting at national and transnational levels. Yet, while transnational tax policy processes are increasingly analyzed through the politics of expertise, national preferences have usually been derived from domestic interest group preferences. We know little about how technical expertise interacts with interest group politics at national level, an important deficit given the sovereignty-preserving, decentralized way in which transnational tax norms become hard law. This article examines the drivers of expansion of the UK’s bilateral tax treaty network in the 1970s, which cannot be explained solely through monolithic interest group politics. Evidence from the British national archives demonstrates how tax experts in the civil service and the private sector, members of a transnational policy community, used tax treaties to impose OECD standards for taxing British firms on host countries, at times overruling the preferences of other political, bureaucratic and business actors. Expertise politics and business power may shape the development of norms and focal points within a transnational policy community, but it is often their interaction at domestic level that determines the implementation of transnational norms as hard law.

Highlights

  • The political debate around the international tax regime that has emerged in recent years focuses on a popular perception that it is far too vulnerable to tax avoidance and evasion (Rixen, 2008a; Christians, 2010c; OECD 2013; Eccleston and Smith, 2016; Hakelberg, 2016; Seabrooke and Wigan, 2016; Büttner and Thiemann, 2017), which occur through Global Wealth Chains (Seabrooke and Wigan, 2017)

  • Scholarship examining the national political economy of international tax rules is limited to only a few examples (Eden, Dacin and Wan, 2001; Barthel and Neumayer, 2012; Sadiq, 2012),1 yet the international tax norms that are the focus of transnational accounts only become tax law when they are adopted by national governments, as the hard law of bilateral tax treaties and national tax codes (Christians, 2007)

  • The concern was about foreign exchange reserves, which could be protected more through income from exports than from direct investment; the likely shift in manufacturing abroad as a result of overseas investment would increase imports (Hopkins, 1973). Discussing this point, the 1976 review concluded that the treaty network at that point ‘neither encourages nor discourages overseas investment in fiscal terms compared with domestic investment, except where matching credit is provided’ (“Double taxation relief”, 1976)

Read more

Summary

Martin Hearson

Imposing ‘acceptable’ standards: transnational expertise and the expansion of the international tax regime. Original citation: Hearson, Martin (2018) Imposing ‘acceptable’ standards: transnational expertise and the expansion of the international tax regime. This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/88351/ Available in LSE Research Online: June 2018. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article to be published by Taylor & Francis in Review of International Political Economy (RIPE).

Introduction
The transnational view
Bringing the national back in
Conflict with political actors
Conclusion
Archival sources
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call