Abstract

Translation of Sindbis virus subgenomic mRNA (sgmRNA) can occur after inactivation of eIF2 by phosphorylation in mammalian cells. Several studies have suggested that eIF2 can be replaced by eIF2A or eIF2D. HAP1 human cell lines knocked-out for eIF2A, eIF2D or both by CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering were compared with wild-type (WT) cells to test the potential role of eIF2A and eIF2D in translation. Sindbis virus infection was comparable between the four cell lines. Moreover, synthesis of viral proteins during late stage infection was similar in all four cell lines despite the fact that eIF2α became phosphorylated. These findings demonstrate that eIF2A and eIF2D are not required for the translation of sgmRNA when eIF2α is phosphorylated. Moreover, silencing of eIF2A or eIF2D by transfection of the corresponding siRNAs in HAP1 WT, HAP1-eIF2A− and HAP1-eIF2D− cells had little effect on the synthesis of viral proteins late in infection. Modification of AUGi to other codons in sgmRNA failed to abrogate translation. Sindbis virus replicons containing these sgmRNA variants could still direct the synthesis of viral proteins. No significant differences were found between the cell lines assayed, suggesting that neither eIF2A nor eIF2D are involved in the translation of this sgmRNA bearing non-AUG codons.

Highlights

  • Conferring eIF2-independent translation of subgenomic mRNA (sgmRNA) in infected mammalian cells[16,17,18]

  • No differences were observed regarding the different C products synthesized in WT and the different KO cell lines tested. These results indicate that neither eIF2A nor eIF2D are involved in the initiation of sgmRNA translation when CUG or GCG replaces AUGi

  • A different example of eIF2-independent translation is provided by the capped sgmRNA from alphaviruses[7,16,17]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Conferring eIF2-independent translation of sgmRNA in infected mammalian cells[16,17,18]. More recent results from mammalian cells suggest that eIF2A is involved in the translation of some specialized cellular mRNAs that initiate translation with non-AUG codons[23,24]. EIF2D has been considered as a true initiation factor, though the exact function of this protein in mammalian cells remains enigmatic. By investigating the potential involvement of these two proteins for the translation of SINV sgmRNA, we demonstrate that these factors are not required for sgmRNA translation, even when eIF2αis phosphorylated These findings support the novel proposal that eIF2 is not replaced by a cellular protein during the translation of SINV sgmRNA, instead this viral mRNA has evolved a specialized structure that makes it independent for eIF2. The consequences for the virus life cycle are that significant amounts of structural proteins can be produced upon the translation of sgmRNA even under stress conditions that appear after viral infection

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call