Abstract

In this perspective piece, we briefly review embodied cognition and embodied learning. We then present a translational research model based on this research to inform teachers, educational psychologists, and practitioners on the benefits of embodied cognition and embodied learning for classroom applications. While many teachers already employ the body in teaching, especially in early schooling, many teachers’ understandings of the science and benefits of sensorimotor engagement or embodied cognition across grades levels and the content areas is little understood. Here, we outline seven goals in our model and four major “action” steps. To address steps 1 and 2, we recap previously published reviews of the experimental evidence of embodied cognition (and embodied learning) research across multiple learning fields, with a focus on how both simple embodied learning activities—as well as those based on more sophisticated technologies of AR, VR, and mixed reality—are being vetted in the classroom. Step 3 of our model outlines how researchers, teachers, policy makers, and designers can work together to help translate this knowledge in support of these goals. In the final step (step 4), we extract generalized, practical embodied learning principles, which can be easily adopted by teachers in the classroom without extensive training. We end with a call for educators and policy makers to use these principles to identify learning objectives and outcomes, as well as track outcomes to assess whether program objectives and competency requirements are met.

Highlights

  • Science ways is predicated on learning to move in new ways Laboratory): https://edrl.berkeley.edu/design/ enact movement that captures the because perception of scientific concepts is

  • Teachers should root themselves in practices that exemplify interaction that supports conceptual modeling, including digital simulations as well as physical manipulatives, especially for STEM fields

  • Manipulatives are most effective when their design enables students forms of sensorimotor engagement that prompt diverse ways of reasoning related to the content, as well as coordinating among these different ways of reasoning [Abrahamson et al (2014)]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Laboratory): https://edrl.berkeley.edu/design/ dimensional experiences in guided actions that instantiate the concept as a (2014), Abrahamson et al (2014)*, Abrahamson and https://edrl.berkeley.edu/design/ Combinations Tower (Embodied Design Laboratory): https://edrl.berkeley.edu/design/ combinations-tower/ 4-Blocks NetLogo (Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling) http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/docs/

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.