[Translated article] Insertion of S1 iliosacral screws in the computed tomography room: An alternative to improve safety in the percutaneous management of posterior pelvic ring injuries

Abstract

IntroductionThe main complication of percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is implant malposition, which can lead to vascular and nerve damage. The anatomical variability of the sacrum can make screw insertion difficult under fluoroscopic guidance. Among the methods described to improve the accuracy of this technique, stands out the use of computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study is to compare the results of iliosacral screw insertion with fluoroscopy or CT navigation. MethodologyRetrospective cohort study of 66 iliosacral screws in 56 patients during 11 years. The screws were inserted with fluoroscopy in the operating room or with CT in the radiodiagnosis area. We collected data on patient characteristics, lesions, treatment, and clinical and radiological results. ResultsForty-seven screws were inserted with fluoroscopy and 19 with CT. A percentage of 18.2 of screws perforated the S1 osseous corridor. All of them were inserted with fluoroscopy guidance (0 vs. 34%; p<0.01). Those operated with CT accumulated more sacral dysmorphism criteria than those operated with fluoroscopy (2.2 vs. 1.6; p=0.02). The S1 corridor on the axial CT view was narrower in those in whom perforation had occurred (18.8 vs. 21.0mm; p=0.02). Two cases with perforation developed S1 radiculalgia. Two endopelvic screws had to be removed. ConclusionWe advise the use of CT guidance for iliosacral screw insertion in patients with sacral dysmorphism or narrow S1 corridors in facilities where other navigation methods are not available.