Translated article] Comparison of the correction of the femoral offset after the use of a stem with modular neck and its monoblock homologue in total primary hip arthroplasty

Abstract

Introduction and objectiveDual modularity stems were introduced with the theoretical advantage of restoring hip anatomy more precisely through femoral offset and limb length adjustment. Interchangeable necks allow for intraoperative angulation, anteversion and length changes. Our objective is to study whether a better femoral offset correction is achieved with the H MAX-M® prosthesis (Limacorporate, San Daniele, Italy) compared to its monoblock counterpart. Material and methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted by means of consecutive sampling on adult patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with the diagnosis of coxarthrosis between January 2011 and December 2015. This cohort has two arms, one arm included patients who underwent modular neck arthroplasty and the other included patients who underwent monoblock total hip arthroplasty. Radiographic offset measurement of the operated hip and the contralateral hip was performed, and the difference between both values was calculated. The mean of the measurements obtained for each arm of the cohort were compared with each other. ResultsNo statistically significant differences were observed in the difference in offset between the operated hip and the contralateral hip (p=.323). No statistically significant differences were observed in the correction of the femoral offset, determined as the difference between the operated hip and the contralateral hip (p=.323). Nor were differences observed in the postoperative offset values (p=.097). It should be noted that for both designs, the majority group is the one with restored offset (p=.001).