Abstract

BackgroundColorectal cancer is mainly attributed to diet, but the role exerted by foods remains unclear because involved factors are extremely complex. Geography substantially impacts on foods. Correlations between international variation in colorectal cancer-associated mutation patterns and food availabilities could highlight the influence of foods on colorectal mutagenesis.MethodologyTo test such hypothesis, we applied techniques based on hierarchical clustering, feature extraction and selection, and statistical pattern recognition to the analysis of 2,572 colorectal cancer-associated TP53 mutations from 12 countries/geographic areas. For food availabilities, we relied on data extracted from the Food Balance Sheets of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Dendrograms for mutation sites, mutation types and food patterns were constructed through Ward's hierarchical clustering algorithm and their stability was assessed evaluating silhouette values. Feature selection used entropy-based measures for similarity between clusterings, combined with principal component analysis by exhaustive and heuristic approaches.Conclusion/SignificanceMutations clustered in two major geographic groups, one including only Western countries, the other Asia and parts of Europe. This was determined by variation in the frequency of transitions at CpGs, the most common mutation type. Higher frequencies of transitions at CpGs in the cluster that included only Western countries mainly reflected higher frequencies of mutations at CpG codons 175, 248 and 273, the three major TP53 hotspots. Pearson's correlation scores, computed between the principal components of the datamatrices for mutation types, food availability and mutation sites, demonstrated statistically significant correlations between transitions at CpGs and both mutation sites and availabilities of meat, milk, sweeteners and animal fats, the energy-dense foods at the basis of “Western” diets. This is best explainable by differential exposure to nitrosative DNA damage due to foods that promote metabolic stress and chronic inflammation.

Highlights

  • The TP53 gene (OMIM no. 191117), which encodes a tumorsuppressor protein that drives multiple cellular responses to stress, including cell-cycle arrest, DNA repair, apoptosis, metabolism and autophagy, is frequently mutated in cancer [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • Several studies addressed the issue of CpG transition mutagenesis in cancer, with particular regard to TP53 mutations in Colorectal cancer (CRC)

  • Laboratory models and data on CRCs in patients carrying a germline methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene variant that results in reduced plasma and serum folate suggest that low folate, by inducing global hypomethylation, may decrease TP53 transition mutagenesis at CpGs [62,63,64]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The TP53 gene (OMIM no. 191117), which encodes a tumorsuppressor protein that drives multiple cellular responses to stress, including cell-cycle arrest, DNA repair, apoptosis, metabolism and autophagy, is frequently mutated in cancer [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The TP53 mutation pattern typical of CRC cannot be correlated to diet, because it is characterized by a striking preponderance of G:C.A:T transitions [9,13,16] These are the most frequent base substitutions induced by reactive oxygen species, byproducts of normal aerobic metabolism generated at high levels in all inflammatory processes and after exposure to a wide variety of carcinogens and toxicants [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Intestinal mutagenesis may be modified by nutrient/ nutrient, nutrient/microflora, nutrient/cell metabolism, nutrient/ gene and nutrient/DNA repair interactions, and affected by epigenetic modifications, transit time of dietary residue, inflammatory and endocrine responses, body mass and energy consumption through physical activity [23,40,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Correlations between international variation in colorectal cancer-associated mutation patterns and food availabilities could highlight the influence of foods on colorectal mutagenesis

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call