Abstract

The perceptual system compensates for fricative–stop coarticulation. Ambiguous stops between /t/ and /k/ tend to be heard as /k/ after /s/-final words and as /t/ after /S/-final words, even when the word–final fricatives are replaced with an ambiguous phoneme [J. L. Elman and J. L. McClelland, J. Mem. Lang. 27, 143–165 (1988)]. Biases in the transitional probabilities (TPs) of /s/ and /S/ in the words in that study mean that the effect following ambiguous fricatives could be due either to lexical involvement in prelexical compensation for coarticulation or to a sensitivity to TP at the prelexical level. In three experiments, listeners categorized nonword–final fricatives with TP biases, word–final fricatives where TPs were controlled, and word–initial stops following both fricative contexts. Categorization of ambiguous fricatives and stops was influenced by the TPs of the fricatives in the nonwords. But although there was a lexical bias in the categorization of the word–final ambiguous fricatives, there was no lexical influence on the categorization of the stops. These results suggest that the lexicon does not influence prelexical processing, and that the prelexical level is sensitive to TP. [Work supported by NIDCD, the Human Frontiers Science Project, and the Max Planck Society.]

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.