Abstract

This article aims to address the apparent contradiction between the urban demographic and migratory trends and the transition towards a more sustainable mobility that local and metropolitan governments seek. To that end, it uses the case of Barcelona, and its metropolitan area during the first decades of the 21st century, characterized by suburbanisation and gentrification. Employing demographic, mobility and transport, and air quality statistics, we intend to analyse: (a) the spatial demographic trends in the metropolitan area of Barcelona (AMB), particularly regarding the core and periphery population growth or decline; (b) trends in daily mobility and how the public and private transport mix has changed; and (c) pollution data changes confirming the success or failure of the private vehicle reduction policy. Findings confirm our initial hypothesis: the slow but steady transition towards sustainable forms of mobility in the core city and the dense contiguous municipalities is counterbalanced by what occurs in the peripheral suburbs. There, the use of private vehicles is still preeminent and growing. Nevertheless, the air quality has improved in the most central municipalities of the AMB (for which data are available), even if not all parameters have seen a similar pollution reduction.

Highlights

  • After the deep economic crisis caused by the 2008 Great Recession, the Spanish economy started to show signs of recovery in 2014

  • The results showed that it is in outer ring suburban towns where active mobility and public transport are used the least and that the highest proportion of daily trips are made by private vehicle

  • This research, which analysed the relationship between recent spatial demographic dynamics in the Barcelona metropolitan area and its consequences on daily mobility, has provided us answers to the three research questions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

After the deep economic crisis caused by the 2008 Great Recession, the Spanish economy started to show signs of recovery in 2014 It grew above the European average until the beginning of 2020—when the coronavirus crisis caused a major upheaval. Though this economic improvement during the so-called “post-crisis” period did not benefit the entire population, it had a relevant impact on the housing market, on activity and employment levels, and on population dynamics. It generated changes in residential mobility flows, with relevant socioeconomic, demographic, and residential implications. The direction of flows, the reasons for moving and the socioeconomic categories and ages of migrants diversified

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.