Abstract

ABSTRACTThe last two decades have witnessed a growing trend towards transit-oriented development (TOD) as a critical approach for achieving sustainable mobility. However, some analysts and community activists have expressed concerns that TOD could induce gentrification and potential concomitant low-income group displacements. This paper presents a systematic review of 35 quantitative research-based studies presenting evidence on gentrification outcomes resulting from transit-based interventions, published between 2000 and 2018. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on this topic and thus provides a useful synthesis of current empirical evidence on transit-induced gentrification. Although there is some evidence supporting the transit-induced gentrification hypothesis, methodological flaws render many of the studies’ conclusions highly questionable. The findings suggest that gentrification is more closely associated with existing local dynamics, built environment attributes, and accompanying policies than transit-oriented development. In its critical analysis of research approaches, this paper warns that the incorporation of several sources of bias into study designs may engender a number of misinterpretations, thus ultimately leading to misguided conclusions and policies.

Highlights

  • Since the 1987 Brundtland Commission report and the 1992 Rio Conference, the sustainability concept has been widely used as a policy guide to develop strategies for more reasonable uses of renewable resources

  • This paper presents a narrative synthesis of the available empirical evidence

  • The high variability in findings and the relevance of local contexts might suggest that gentrification is more closely associated with existing local dynamics, built environment attributes, and accompanying policies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the 1987 Brundtland Commission report and the 1992 Rio Conference, the sustainability concept has been widely used as a policy guide to develop strategies for more reasonable uses of renewable resources. Awareness has been growing on the contribution of urban transport and mobility to major environmental externalities, and the development of demand management programmes has striven to reduce the mobility footprint through modal shifts and the reduction of automobile dependence (Banister, 2008)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call