Abstract

The mean input and variance of the total synaptic input to a neuron can vary independently, suggesting two distinct information channels. Here we examine the impact of rapidly varying signals, delivered via these two information conduits, on the temporal dynamics of neuronal firing rate responses. We examine the responses of model neurons to step functions in either the mean or the variance of the input current. Our results show that the temporal dynamics governing response onset depends on the choice of model. Specifically, the existence of a hard threshold introduces an instantaneous component into the response onset of a leaky-integrate-and-fire model that is not present in other models studied here. Other response features, for example a decaying oscillatory approach to a new steady-state firing rate, appear to be more universal among neuronal models. The decay time constant of this approach is a power-law function of noise magnitude over a wide range of input parameters. Understanding how specific model properties underlie these response features is important for understanding how neurons will respond to rapidly varying signals, as the temporal dynamics of the response onset and response decay to new steady-state determine what range of signal frequencies a population of neurons can respond to and faithfully encode.

Highlights

  • Cortical neurons continuously receive input from a large number of excitatory and inhibitory synapses [1]

  • In this study we focus on three well-known integrate-and-fire models, the leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) model, the quadratic integrate-and-fire (QIF) model [32,33], and the exponential integrate-and-fire (EIF) model [30]

  • We have studied the temporal dynamics of the firing rate response of integrate-and-fire and conductance-based models to rapid changes in mean or noise

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cortical neurons continuously receive input from a large number of excitatory and inhibitory synapses [1]. The net synaptic current to a neuron, obtained from the difference between excitatory and inhibitory components, may be quite small compared to the total level of synaptic input (the sum of these two components) if the majority of excitation is cancelled by inhibition. In this case, the mean input current may be quite small, the variability introduced into the neuronal responses can be large. One purpose of this study is to further explore the consequences of using noise, or input current variance, as a possible information conduit to the neuron

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call