Abstract
This study deepens on the transient response analysis of the so-called vector proportional–integral (VPI) controllers and compares them with the popular proportional–resonant (PR) controllers for grid-connected applications. The employed methodology is based on the study of the error signal roots: both reference tracking and disturbance rejection abilities are considered for proper gain tuning. This study proves that PR controllers lead to shorter settling times than VPI controllers. A three-phase voltage source converter prototype has been implemented. Experimental results comparing the transient behaviour of VPI and PR controllers in different conditions are provided: a + 90° phase-angle jump in the current reference and a ‘type C’ voltage sag at the point of common coupling.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
