Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the effects of transient neurologic signs evident in infancy on motor outcomes in 41/2-year-old children born biologically at risk. Children who appeared neurologically normal at each of the 4-month, 12-month, and 24-month visits in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Follow-Up Clinic were assigned to the neurologically normal (NN) group ( n = 42). Children who appeared to have neuromotor abnormalities at either or both the 4-month and 12-month visits, and who were then rated as “normal” at the 24-month visit, were assigned to the transient neurological signs (TNS) group ( n = 19). The groups were compared on motor and cognitive measures at the 41/2-year clinic visit. No significant differences between groups were found except on the measure of pencil prehension, in which the TNS group scored significantly lower ( p < .01) than the NN group. A more thorough assessment of fine motor skills at the preschool level may be indicated when following the neurodevelopmental course of children born biologically at risk.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call