Abstract

In the development of catalytic materials, a set of standard conditions is needed where the kinetic performance of many samples can be compared. This can be challenging when a sample set covers a broad range of activity. Precise kinetic characterization requires uniformity in the gas and catalyst bed composition. This limits the range of convecting devices to low conversion (generally <20%). While steady-state kinetics offer a snapshot of conversion, yield and apparent rates of the slow reaction steps, transient techniques offer much greater detail of rate processes and hence more information as to why certain catalyst compositions offer better performance. In this work, transient experiments in two transport regimes are compared: an advecting differential plug flow reactor (PFR) and a pure-diffusion temporal analysis of products (TAP) reactor. The decomposition of ammonia was used as a model reaction to test three simple materials: polycrystalline iron, cobalt and a bimetallic preparation of the two. These materials presented a wide range of activity and it was not possible to capture transient information in the advecting device for all samples at the same conditions while ensuring uniformity. We push the boundary for the theoretical estimates of uniformity in the TAP device and find reliable kinetic measurement up to 90% conversion. However, what is more advantageous from this technique is the ability to observe the time-dependence of the reaction rate rather than just singular points of conversion and yield. For example, on the iron sample we observed reversible adsorption of ammonia and on cobalt materials we identify two routes for hydrogen production. From the time-dependence of reactants and product, the dynamic accumulation was calculated. This was used to understand the atomic distribution of H and N species regulated by the surface of different materials. When ammonia was pulsed at 550 °C, the surface hydrogen/nitrogen, (H/N), ratios that evolved for Fe, CoFe and Co were 2.4, 0.25 and 0.3 respectively. This indicates that iron will store a mixture of hydrogenated species while materials with cobalt will predominantly store NH and N. While much is already known about iron, cobalt and ammonia decomposition, the goal of this work was to demonstrate new tools for comparing materials over a wider window of conversion and with much greater kinetic detail. As such, this provides an approach for detailed kinetic discrimination of more complex industrial samples beyond conversion and yield.

Highlights

  • An indispensable need in the design and development of catalytic materials is establishing a robust, broad-reaching yet precise basis for comparison of catalyst properties

  • The details of properly separating the transport and kinetic time-dependencies are discussed. These results demonstrate the advantages of the temporal analysis of products (TAP) non-steady-state characterization method for discriminating subtleties of kinetic function in different materials at high conversion

  • To study the time-dependence intact we present a result showing the importance of the Y-procedure method in accurately separating transport and kinetic effects in the pulse response experimental

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An indispensable need in the design and development of catalytic materials is establishing a robust, broad-reaching yet precise basis for comparison of catalyst properties. Structural characterization techniques for properties of both the bulk and surface are numerous, widely used and well-developed: X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), infrared (IR), Raman, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), etc. There are two mainstream kinetic devices: the plug flow reactor (PFR) and the continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) (or differential PFR). These are typically operated at steady-state and yield useful global reaction conditions more similar to the industrial use setting

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.