Abstract

Genomic studies performed through liquid biopsies widely elucidated the evolutionary trajectory of RAS mutant clones under the selective pressure of EGFR inhibitors in patients with wild type RAS primary colorectal tumors. Similarly, the disappearance of RAS mutant clones in plasma has been more recently reported in some patients with primary RAS mutant cancers, supporting for the first time an unexpected negative selection of RAS mutations during the clonal evolution of mCRC. To date, the extent of conversion to RAS wild type disease at the time of progression has not been clarified yet. As a proof of concept, we prospectively enrolled mCRC patients progressing under anti-VEGF based treatments. Idylla™ system was used to screen RAS mutations in plasma and the wild type status of RAS was further confirmed through IT-PGM (Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine) sequencing. RAS was found mutant in 55% of cases, retaining the same plasma mutation as in the primary tumor at diagnosis, while it was found wild-type in 45%. Four patients testing negative for RAS mutations in plasma at the time of progression of disease (PD) were considered eligible for treatment with EGFR inhibitors and treated accordingly, achieving a clinical benefit. We here propose a hypothetical algorithm that accounts for the transient disappearance of RAS mutant clones over time, which might extend the continuum of care of mutant RAS colorectal cancer patients through the delivery of a further line of therapy.

Highlights

  • In metastatic colorectal cancer, RAS mutational status guides the therapeutic use of EGFR inhibitors; genotyping cancer tissue is mandatory in routine practice to personalize treatments

  • Mutations of the KRAS oncogene is a powerful negative predictive biomarker to identify patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who do not benefit from EGFR therapy, and much evidence has been provided that clinical benefit from treatment with EGFR-I is limited to patients with tumors harboring the wild-type KRAS gene

  • Patients should be considered for treatment with Bevacizumab post-continuation strategy or Aflibercept or ramucirumab with a change in chemotherapy backbone, while regorafenib or TAS-102 are used as third line options [1]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), RAS mutational status guides the therapeutic use of EGFR inhibitors; genotyping cancer tissue is mandatory in routine practice to personalize treatments. Mutations of the KRAS oncogene is a powerful negative predictive biomarker to identify patients with mCRC who do not benefit from EGFR therapy, and much evidence has been provided that clinical benefit from treatment with EGFR-I is limited to patients with tumors harboring the wild-type KRAS gene. In RAS mutant colorectal cancer, the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab is used with cytotoxic doublets FOLFOX/CAPOX/FOLFIRI in the first-line treatment setting and usually continued in combination with any cytotoxic agent or any combination of cytotoxic agents until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Evidence has been provided that the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood samples is a remarkable surrogate of tumor biopsy for mutations detection, with the unique advantage to allow the monitoring of temporal heterogeneity of cancer during the course of targeted therapies [2,3]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.