Abstract

Human activity is determined to a great extent by not only biological sex but also gender. The aim of the study was to examine relationships between transgression and types of gender. A population of 558 individuals (399 women and 159 men) aged 19–25 (mean age: 22.6) were studied. The age of the women ranged from 19 to 24 (mean age: 22.4) and of the men—from 19 to 25 (mean age: 22.8). In order to examine the intensity of transgression, the Polish version of the chronic self-destructiveness scale was applied. The gender was studied by means of the Polish version of the Bem sex role inventory. Androgynous women achieved the highest and feminine men—the lowest scores on the transgression scale. In women, the masculinity scale positively correlated with the transgression scale, whereas the femininity scale did not significantly correlate with transgression, although the coefficient was negative. No statistically significant correlations were found in men (although the coefficients were positive). Biological sex and gender were qualitative variables that differentiated the intensity of transgression. Equilibrium between the psychological dimension of femininity and the psychological dimension of masculinity was vital for transgressive tendencies, particularly in women. Androgynous women showed rather the adaptive aspect of transgression.

Highlights

  • Biological sex and psychological gender are factors determining human activity

  • Transgression is among crucial indirect self-destructiveness categories and transgressive behaviours epitomise indirectly self-destructive behaviours, the distribution of scores on the transgression scale differed from the distribution of scores for indirect selfdestructiveness as a generalised behavioural tendency [cf. 1]

  • Psychological gender was a factor that differentiated the intensity of transgression whose highest intensity occurred in androgynous individuals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biological sex is a set of traits with which an individual is born; it seems to be an obvious and natural matter. Psychological gender, and in particular the ‘‘configuration’’ of psychological feminine and masculine traits in every individual, independent of biological sex, seems to be less obvious and natural. For a long time biological structures, e.g. sex chromosomes, and psychological concepts such as gender identity have been distinguished; the term ‘‘sex’’ refers to physical traits of the individual and the term ‘‘gender’’ refers to psychological traits and behaviour of the human [2,3,4]. Sex-typed individuals possess psychological traits consistent with their biological sex (feminine women, masculine men). Cross-sex-typed (sex-reversed) individuals have psychological traits consistent with the sex opposite to their biological sex (masculine women, feminine men) [5,6,7,8]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.