Transfused Blood, Serum Hepatitis, and the Coase Theorem

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessTransfused Blood, Serum Hepatitis, and the Coase TheoremReuben A. KesselReuben A. Kessel Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Law and Economics Volume 17, Number 2Oct., 1974 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Booth School of Business and The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/466793 Views: 4Total views on this site Citations: 26Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1974 The University of Chicago Law SchoolPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Diana W. Thomas, Michael D. Thomas Regulation, competition, and the social control of business, Public Choice 107 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-022-00989-zAbel François, Olivier Gergaud Is civic duty the solution to the paradox of voting?, Public Choice 180, no.3-43-4 (Jan 2019): 257–283.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-00635-7Jeremy Frank Shearmur The Gift Relationship Revisited, HEC Forum 27, no.44 (Oct 2014): 301–317.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-014-9252-6Julian J. Koplin From blood donation to kidney sales: the gift relationship and transplant commercialism, Monash Bioethics Review 33, no.2-32-3 (Oct 2015): 102–122.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0035-xJoan Costa-Font, Mireia Jofre-Bonet, Steven T. Yen Not All Incentives Wash Out the Warm Glow: The Case of Blood Donation Revisited, Kyklos 66, no.44 (Oct 2013): 529–551.https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12034Emanuel D. Thorne Chapter 20 The Economics of organ transplantation, (Jan 2006): 1335–1370.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0714(06)02020-3Cento Veljanovski The Economics of Law, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.935952 Philippe Fontaine Blood, Politics, and Social Science: Richard Titmuss and the Institute of Economic Affairs, 1957–1973 Fontaine, Isis 93, no.33 (Jul 2015): 401–434.https://doi.org/10.1086/374061Emanuel D. Thorne The Common Property Nature of Market-inalienability, (Jan 2000): 47–77.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62745-5_2Robert B. Ekelund, Robert D. Tollison On neoinstitutional theory and preclassical economies: mercantilism revisited, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 4, no.33 (Jul 2006): 375–399.https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719700000058Hartwig von Schubert Donated blood—Gift or commodity?, Social Science & Medicine 39, no.22 (Jul 1994): 201–206.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90328-XAudrey B. Davidson, Robert B. Ekelund America's Alternative to Marshall: Property, Competition, and Capitalism in Hadley's Economics of 1896, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 16, no.11 (Jun 2009): 1–26.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837200001395STEPHEN J. SPURR The Shortage of Transplantable Organs: An Analysis and a Proposal, Law & Policy 15, no.44 (Oct 1993): 355–395.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1993.tb00113.xWarren Greenberg, Deborah Kamin Property rights and payment to patients for cell lines derived from human tissues: An economic analysis, Social Science & Medicine 36, no.88 (Apr 1993): 1071–1076.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90125-NHamish Stewart Rationality and the market for human blood, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 19, no.22 (Oct 1992): 125–143.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(92)90087-RKEITH N. HYLTON The Law and Economics of Organ Procurement, Law & Policy 12, no.33 (Jul 1990): 197–224.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1990.tb00047.xRussell D. Roberts, Michael J. Wolkoff Improving the Quality and Quantity of Whole Blood Supply: Limits to Voluntary Arrangements, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 13, no.11 (Feb 1988): 167–178.https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-13-1-167Susan Rose-Ackerman Efficiency, Equity and Inalienability, (Jan 1986): 11–37.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4442-8_2Howard S. Schwartz Bioethical and Legal Considerations in Increasing the Supply of Transplantable Organs: From UAGA to “Baby Fae”, American Journal of Law & Medicine 10, no.44 (Feb 2021): 397–437.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0098858800009369CATHY BUCHANAN, ELIZABETH W. PRIOR Bureaucrats and Babies: Government Regulation of the Supply of Genetic Material*, Economic Record 60, no.33 (Sep 1984): 222–230.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1984.tb00857.xPhilip Jacobs, Ronald P. Wilder Pricing behavior of non-profit agencies, Journal of Health Economics 3, no.11 (Apr 1984): 49–61.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6296(84)90025-0Richard J. Arneson Commerce and Selfishness, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 8 (Jan 2020): 211–232.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1982.10715830Marvin Brams Transplantable Human Organs: Should Their Sale Be Authorized by State Statutes?, American Journal of Law & Medicine 3, no.22 (Feb 2021): 183–195.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0098858800005359 The High Cost of Cheap Blood, New England Journal of Medicine 294, no.1212 (Mar 1976): 675–675.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197603182941226Richard A. Epstein Medical Malpractice: The Case for Contract, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1, no.11 (Nov 2018): 87–149.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1976.tb00953.xJulia D. Mahoney Should we adopt a market strategy to organ donation?, (): 65–88.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3709(01)80007-8