Abstract

The Housing First (HF) approach to counteracting homelessness, stemming from the USA, is advocated as a blueprint for homelessness policy change in Europe, including the Nordic countries. In contrast to traditional homelessness policies based on shelters as the first step towards ending homelessness, the HF policy discourse regards access to one’s own housing as a basic human right that should not be conditional upon good or acceptable behaviour. Building on ethnographic research in a Swedish HF unit striving to implement the HF approach ‘by the book,’ which includes both focus group interviews with workers and observations of worker–client interactions during home visits, we show how the new HF policy challenges both workers and clients, who used to encounter each other in shelters but now meet in clients’ own homes, transforming their identities. We demonstrate how workers account for transformations in worker–client identities by referring to how they and their clients used to think, talk and act, thus contrasting their new identities with their former selves. Moreover, in their efforts to accomplish their actual work tasks within the framework of the new HF policy discourse in the homes of formerly homeless clients, we show how workers struggle with their identities when they encounter clients in practice. In their accounts of policy change, the workers embraced their new identities with pleasure, but in practice, they were hesitant when dealing with issues of concern, such as their clients’ use of tobacco, alcohol and drugs. In sum, it becomes complicated in practice.

Highlights

  • The Housing First (HF) approach to counteracting home‐ lessness, stemming from the USA (Tsemberis, 2010; Tsemberis & Eisenberg, 2000), is advocated as a blueprint for change in homelessness policies in Europe, including the Nordic countries (Hansen Löfstrand & Juhila, 2017)

  • In European research based on data from different coun‐ tries, the HF approach has been portrayed as a success‐ ful response to homelessness and can be seen to con‐ stitute a moral story of why policy change—from shel‐ ters to HF—is needed (Hansen Löfstrand & Juhila, 2017)

  • A key to under‐ standing accounts of the policy change from shelters to HF and the efforts made to achieve the change in practice is by recurrently drawing upon ‘contrasting com‐ parisons’ (Hansen Löfstrand & Juhila, 2017, pp. 24–27; Smith, 1978) between the ‘old’ shelter system and the ‘new’ HF approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Housing First (HF) approach to counteracting home‐ lessness, stemming from the USA (Tsemberis, 2010; Tsemberis & Eisenberg, 2000), is advocated as a blueprint for change in homelessness policies in Europe, including the Nordic countries (Hansen Löfstrand & Juhila, 2017). In European research based on data from different coun‐ tries, the HF approach has been portrayed as a success‐ ful response to homelessness and can be seen to con‐ stitute a moral story of why policy change—from shel‐ ters to HF—is needed (Hansen Löfstrand & Juhila, 2017). Accounts of policy change (on what it entails and why it is needed) becomes an institutionalised dis‐ course in country and policy contexts as well as con‐ crete social settings (cf Miller, 1994). A key to under‐ standing accounts of the policy change from shelters to HF and the efforts made to achieve the change in practice is by recurrently drawing upon ‘contrasting com‐ parisons’ (Hansen Löfstrand & Juhila, 2017, pp. 24–27; Smith, 1978) between the ‘old’ shelter system and the ‘new’ HF approach

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.