Abstract
The Religions special issue, “Transforming Encounters and Critical Reflection: African Thought, Critical Theory, and Liberation Theology in Dialogue,” addresses the concern over the present postcolonial context in which African persons and societies find themselves. The issue attempts to gain a further understanding of this context through a dialogue between these three disciplines, but what emerges from this attempt? As a critical response to the issue as a whole, this article will reveal that each author presents different yet converging perspectives on the questions: ‘what is liberation and from what are we being liberated?’ This article begins by phrasing this question through Frantz Fanon’s critique on the postcolony, where he sees that the same logic—what Schalk Gerber’s article calls ‘the logic of the colonizer’—is still employed in the postcolony. This article unpacks the entanglement created by this logic and how each author addresses it in different ways. Importantly, this is not a review of each article; rather, it seeks to reveal the narrative created by this interdisciplinary dialogue in order to further the conversation on oppression and liberation in an African context. In so doing, it reveals how each author addresses the concept of liberation or freedom and where they partially (or perhaps provisionally) agree that liberation entails embodied communal responsibility as being-with others, the importance of transparent dialogue, the need for new rationalities to enter the discussion of African self-determination, while also highlighting the dangers of appropriating these new rationalities when bringing them into an African context or when moving theory into praxis.
Highlights
This article is an in-depth response to this Religions special issue since the conversations touched upon in this issue are themselves in medias res
“Transforming Encounters and Critical Reflection: African Thought, Critical Theory, and Liberation Theology in Dialogue” explores the founding principles of this conversation. What these articles reveal is a common thread running through the each respective discipline’s questioning of what comes after the postcolony; what is for African societies in particular and for the global community at large
Verhoef’s article, “Encountering Transcendence: Žižek, Liberation Theology and African Thought in Dialogue,” returns to the issues of the logical, metaphysical structures undergirding postcolonial independence, which is similar to Fanon’s critique and to the critiques highlighted throughout my reading of this special issue: namely, that the logic of independence or liberation entails a metaphysical structure, which requires us to explore how this logical apparatus, or any one that replaces it, orders concepts and understandings through a conceptual framework
Summary
This article is an in-depth response to this Religions special issue since the conversations touched upon in this issue are themselves in medias res.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.